Score + - 1 Report post.
Posted on 2016-08-06 23:47:00 by mixmariobros
Remove | Add note | Keep | Edit | Note history | Tag History | Previous | Next
7 comments (0 hidden)
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-06 23:52:23 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She looks....5 years old.
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-06 23:58:14 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
A 5 year old with no panties. Yeah. I had to report that dude, sorry.
azerty47
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:00:20 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She does look young, but she's in no sexual situation, nor does she show any privates, so it's OK to keep.
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:03:15 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She's still nude under the waist and literally asking for a sexual situation. Technically, it's against the rules.
mixmariobros
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:14:35 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She has all her private areas completely hidden and the situation isn´t clear enough it´s sexualixed at all, no problems with this pic
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:19:51 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Excuses. For something that exists only to potentially work it's way around child/loli porn rules.
I'll leave it up for the admins to decide.
Koter
Posted on 2016-08-07 01:11:13 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
As stated by Azerty, the privates aren't shown and the situation isn't sexual.
Missing panties and a slight bit of text isn't enough to make this sexual.
I appreciate your concern Rtuenuik, and please do continue to call into question images of which you aren't sure they should be on the site or are against the rules.
Posted on 2016-08-06 23:47:00 by mixmariobros
Remove | Add note | Keep | Edit | Note history | Tag History | Previous | Next
7 comments (0 hidden)
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-06 23:52:23 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She looks....5 years old.
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-06 23:58:14 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
A 5 year old with no panties. Yeah. I had to report that dude, sorry.
azerty47
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:00:20 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She does look young, but she's in no sexual situation, nor does she show any privates, so it's OK to keep.
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:03:15 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She's still nude under the waist and literally asking for a sexual situation. Technically, it's against the rules.
mixmariobros
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:14:35 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
She has all her private areas completely hidden and the situation isn´t clear enough it´s sexualixed at all, no problems with this pic
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2016-08-07 00:19:51 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Excuses. For something that exists only to potentially work it's way around child/loli porn rules.
I'll leave it up for the admins to decide.
Koter
Posted on 2016-08-07 01:11:13 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
As stated by Azerty, the privates aren't shown and the situation isn't sexual.
Missing panties and a slight bit of text isn't enough to make this sexual.
I appreciate your concern Rtuenuik, and please do continue to call into question images of which you aren't sure they should be on the site or are against the rules.
1