Score + - 0 Report post.
Posted on 2015-05-14 02:33:14 by Koter
Remove | Add note | Keep | Edit | Note history | Tag History | Previous | Next
9 comments (0 hidden)
Koter
Posted on 2015-05-14 03:05:16 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Hmm, good point, they are too young actually (no age stated, but we know...)
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2015-05-14 06:10:10 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Eh. Could be worse. Someone make actually made a drawing like this of Saoirse from Song of the Sea, who is four years old.
Still even if it's like an 8 year old I can't help but feel creeped out...
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2015-05-14 06:11:10 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I cross the line when it comes to children.
darkblade7557
Posted on 2015-05-14 13:04:11 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I personally have nothing against lolis(Toddlercon is truly sick shit if you ask me, lolis can be cute.)... but this pic might be a little too suggestive to post it here. Also to me word "loli" only refers to fictional characters. I actually HATE kids, because they are loud, disgusting and annoying XD.
I only feel creeped out when in hentai doujin loli's age is clearly referenced with something like "I'm in third/fourth/fifth grade, onii-chan!"... then it becomes creepy.
mixmariobros
Posted on 2015-05-14 15:51:11 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I don´t see the big deal personally, it´s just a drawing, nor to mention that anime style characters and real life people looks extremelly different, no child is being harmed there. besides, just like liking violent pics doesn´t mean you´re a violent person, liking lolis doesn´t mean you´re a pedophile
anyway, this ic is boderline sure, but there´s no genitalia involved and barely showns a nipple,not to mention is crearly of a playful nature rather than something sexual like footjob or such, so yeah, don´t think it´s bad enough to get deleted
Animefootify
Posted on 2015-05-14 20:05:22 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I completely agree with mixmariobros, they're just drawings- and not even realistic depictions of real-life children. I don't see any problem with it either. Unfortunately, Booru.org does see it as a problem. So please, be careful what you post guys.
However, this particular piece should be fine though. I mean they're not flat chested or anything, so they could pass for adults. *shrug*
darkblade7557
Posted on 2015-05-15 10:56:31 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I agree, as I mentioned before lolis are cute, and have NOTHING to do with real life children.
Sadly most people like for example video game publishers seem to think if someone likes loli then he must be pedophile, and so they always censor the shit out of games that feature even slightly loli-like character in slightly ecchi situation.
Glorious exception from it are guys who publish Senran Kagura games who actually had a brilliant idea, they just don't ever mention character ages in translation. Everything else is intact(And it has one loli character).
It can't be said about publisher of Monster Monpiece on PS Vita who cut out 10% of cards from the game(Some of them not even showing actual lolis, I guess they just felt like being dicks to people who want the game in entirety. Or maybe were some hardcore gay people hating female bodies... who knows? XD), or publisher of Criminal Girls Invitation who cut out voices and heavily censored "punishment" scenes. I also heard that a PS3 game made by Nippon Ichi(Forgot title of it) had whole segment of it cut out due to lolis taking bath...
People in Europe and America should learn to be more accepting of that stuff, instead of just cutting games to pieces to satisfy few pseudo moralistic people
Animefootify
Posted on 2015-05-15 19:58:22 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Well said, dark. People are WAY too pc these days and are so quick to just slap a label on somebody. So it has people walking on eggshells constantly. It's so irritating...
Posted on 2015-05-14 02:33:14 by Koter
Remove | Add note | Keep | Edit | Note history | Tag History | Previous | Next
9 comments (0 hidden)
Koter
Posted on 2015-05-14 03:05:16 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Hmm, good point, they are too young actually (no age stated, but we know...)
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2015-05-14 06:10:10 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Eh. Could be worse. Someone make actually made a drawing like this of Saoirse from Song of the Sea, who is four years old.
Still even if it's like an 8 year old I can't help but feel creeped out...
rtuenuik2
Posted on 2015-05-14 06:11:10 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I cross the line when it comes to children.
darkblade7557
Posted on 2015-05-14 13:04:11 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I personally have nothing against lolis(Toddlercon is truly sick shit if you ask me, lolis can be cute.)... but this pic might be a little too suggestive to post it here. Also to me word "loli" only refers to fictional characters. I actually HATE kids, because they are loud, disgusting and annoying XD.
I only feel creeped out when in hentai doujin loli's age is clearly referenced with something like "I'm in third/fourth/fifth grade, onii-chan!"... then it becomes creepy.
mixmariobros
Posted on 2015-05-14 15:51:11 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I don´t see the big deal personally, it´s just a drawing, nor to mention that anime style characters and real life people looks extremelly different, no child is being harmed there. besides, just like liking violent pics doesn´t mean you´re a violent person, liking lolis doesn´t mean you´re a pedophile
anyway, this ic is boderline sure, but there´s no genitalia involved and barely showns a nipple,not to mention is crearly of a playful nature rather than something sexual like footjob or such, so yeah, don´t think it´s bad enough to get deleted
Animefootify
Posted on 2015-05-14 20:05:22 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I completely agree with mixmariobros, they're just drawings- and not even realistic depictions of real-life children. I don't see any problem with it either. Unfortunately, Booru.org does see it as a problem. So please, be careful what you post guys.
However, this particular piece should be fine though. I mean they're not flat chested or anything, so they could pass for adults. *shrug*
darkblade7557
Posted on 2015-05-15 10:56:31 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I agree, as I mentioned before lolis are cute, and have NOTHING to do with real life children.
Sadly most people like for example video game publishers seem to think if someone likes loli then he must be pedophile, and so they always censor the shit out of games that feature even slightly loli-like character in slightly ecchi situation.
Glorious exception from it are guys who publish Senran Kagura games who actually had a brilliant idea, they just don't ever mention character ages in translation. Everything else is intact(And it has one loli character).
It can't be said about publisher of Monster Monpiece on PS Vita who cut out 10% of cards from the game(Some of them not even showing actual lolis, I guess they just felt like being dicks to people who want the game in entirety. Or maybe were some hardcore gay people hating female bodies... who knows? XD), or publisher of Criminal Girls Invitation who cut out voices and heavily censored "punishment" scenes. I also heard that a PS3 game made by Nippon Ichi(Forgot title of it) had whole segment of it cut out due to lolis taking bath...
People in Europe and America should learn to be more accepting of that stuff, instead of just cutting games to pieces to satisfy few pseudo moralistic people
Animefootify
Posted on 2015-05-15 19:58:22 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
Well said, dark. People are WAY too pc these days and are so quick to just slap a label on somebody. So it has people walking on eggshells constantly. It's so irritating...
1